Question no.1 and 2

 1.Discuss whether the firm is dissolved in each situation with reference to Sections 39–43 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

Answer

1. Mutual agreement — Section 40

Yes. A firm may be dissolved with the consent of all the partners or according to a contract between the partners. Therefore, if A, B and C mutually agree to dissolve the firm, it can be dissolved under Section 40. �

India Code

2. All partners except A become insolvent — Section 41

Yes. Section 41 provides for compulsory dissolution where all the partners, or all except one partner, are adjudged insolvent. Therefore, the firm will be compulsorily dissolved. �

India Code

3. Business becomes unlawful — Section 41

Yes. If an event occurs which makes it unlawful to carry on the firm's business or to carry it on in partnership, the firm is compulsorily dissolved. However, where the firm carries on separate lawful undertakings, illegality of one undertaking does not necessarily dissolve the firm in respect of the lawful undertakings. �

India Code

4. Expiry of fixed term — Section 42(a)

Yes. Subject to any contract between the partners, where a firm is constituted for a fixed term, it is dissolved on expiry of that term. �

India Code

5. Partnership at will — Section 43

Yes. A partnership at will may be dissolved by any partner giving notice in writing to all the other partners of his intention to dissolve the firm.

The firm is dissolved from:

the date mentioned in the notice; or

if no date is mentioned, from the date on which the notice is communicated.



Q2 . Explain the doctrine of “Holding Out” under Section 28 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. What are the essential conditions for its application? Is a person who represents himself as a partner liable to third parties even though he is not actually a partner? Explain with suitable examples.

Answer:

Section 28 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with “Holding Out.” It provides that when a person, by words spoken or written or by conduct, represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, as a partner in a firm, he is liable as a partner to any person who has given credit to the firm on the faith of such representation.

Essential conditions

Representation: The person must represent himself, or knowingly allow himself to be represented, as a partner.

Representation may be by words or conduct: It can be express or implied.

Knowledge: Where the representation is made by another person, the alleged partner must knowingly permit it.

Third-party reliance: The third party must have given credit to the firm believing the representation.

Liability: The person is liable to that third party as though he were actually a partner.

Example

A is not a partner of XYZ Firm, but he knowingly allows the firm to represent him as a partner. B, believing A to be a partner, gives a loan to XYZ Firm. If the firm fails to repay the loan, A will be liable to B as a partner by holding out, subject to the requirements of Section 28.

Important point

Holding out does not make the person an actual partner of the firm. It creates liability


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Corner stone class no.2

Corner stone class no.1

Practice session 3