ENGLISH KA MAHASAGAR BY ADV.PANKAJ JOSHI

   Corner 🪨 stone class no.27 Rule modal ought to  इस modal का प्रयोग नैतिक शिक्षा वाले वाक्यों में किया जाता है। Sub+ought to+v1+object  करना चाहिए  1. हमें अपनी संतानों को देशभक्ति और बहादुरी सिखानी चाहिए । अच्छे संस्कार मजबूत राष्ट्र की नींव का पत्थर होते हैं  We ought to inculcate patriotism and bravery to our offspring.sound sacraments are corner stone of robust nation . 2.उसे नैतिक शिक्षा वाली कहानियों से नैतिक मुल्य ग्रहण करने चाहिए । अच्छे संस्कार  बढ़ते अपराध के प्रति सबसे बड़ा डर होते हैं। He ought to imbibe ethics/ethos from fables .sound sacraments are deterrent to soaring crimes. 3.हर भारतीय को पवित्र भारतीय परंपराओं  के प्रति अपना सिर झुकाना चाहिए । अनोखी परंपराये हमारे लिए एक अनोखा खजाना है । Each Indian  ought to pay obeisance towards the Indian customs .bizarre mores are peculiar reservoir for us. 4.हर संस्कारित भारतीय को सत्य की राह पर कदम रखना चाहिए ।सत्य और  निष्ठा  इंसान के अमर गुण होते हैं। Each sacramented In...

  ruins   Modal may  इस माडल का प्रयोग गहरी संभावना के लिए किया जाता है। 1.you may steal his new bike from a stark ruins  2.he may eat stale food due to his abysmal poverty  3.she may bury a hacked corpse under a tree 🌲  4.he may abuse and assualt his friend in intoxication condition  5.she may sell his house due heavy debt  6.he may tell a lie to cheat you 7.they may cheat/ dupe you in the name of fraud calls  8.you may beat him  black and blue due to his misbehaviour  9.he may scare the people in  shanty town due to hooliganism . 10. A hooligan may  pilfer your coffer due to his hooliganism 

  Section 134-----discharge of surety by release of discharge of principal debtor----- The surety is discharged by any contract between the creditor and principal debtor  By which the principal debtor is released or by any act or omission of creditor  The legal consequences of which is the discharge of the principal debtor  Illustrations  A.A gives a guarantee to C for goods to be supplied by C to B . C supplies goods to B and afterwards.B becomes embarassed and contracts with his creditors to assign to them his property in consideration of this releasing him from their demands .here B is released from his debt by the contracts with C and A is discharged from his suretyship .

   Topic no.1 ----tense no.1---present indefinite Sub+v1/v5+object ---affirmative sentence Sub+does not/do not+v1+object-----negative sentence  Explanation ---जब कर्ता he/she/it/any singular हो और वाक्य सकारात्मक हो तो v5  आयेगा When subject is singular we can use v5----v1+s/es When sub is plural we can use v1   जब कर्ता he/she/it/any singular हो और वाक्य नकारात्मक हो तो  does not+v1आयेगा  1.He/she /it/any singular ---v5/does not+v1 V5---v1+es/s ********************** जब कर्ता I/you/we/they/any plural  हो और वाक्य सकारात्मक हो तो v1आयेगा और वाक्य नकारात्मक हो तो donot+v1 आयेगा । 2.you/we/they/I/any plural---v1/do not+v1 Simple sentences  1.an adroit doctor treats the patients in an expensive hospital. 2.the theist people worship in edifice temple. 3.a farmer/tiller reaps the crops with a sickle . 4.my neighbour sells spurious ghee to make a quick buck . 5.the people stroll in sappy garden in wee hours . 6.the children prank in jampacked class...

   Contract Act Test  1. A bank customer took an overdraft from his account. The defendant gave a guarantee for this payment. The overdraft is void and not enforceable under the Act. The customer did not pay. He was sued. Explain the guarantee of liability in this case? (Swan v Bank of Scotland) Solution ----in this case overdraft is void and not enforceable under any act in this case principal debtor is not liable .if principal debtor is not liable then surety is automatically not liable .so in this case both are not liable .because overdraft is void and not enforceable under the act . 2. The defendant was invited to guarantee the credibility of an employee. But that employee was dismissed from the job due to dishonesty. This fact was not told to the guarantor. After the guarantee he was kept on the job and he committed fraud/embezzlement in the accounts? The guarantor was sued for damages? State the responsibility of the guarantor in this case? (London General Omnibus C...

  अनुबंध अधिनियम परीक्षण  1. एक बैंक के ग्राहक ने अपने खाते से ओवरड्राफ्ट लिया था। इस भुगतान के लिए प्रतिवादी ने गारंटी दी थी। ओवरड्राफ्ट शून्य है और अधिनियम के तहत लागू नहीं है। ग्राहक ने भुगतान नहीं किया है। उस पर मुकदमा चलाया गया था। इस मामले में देयता की गारंटी के बारे में बताएं? (स्वान बनाम बैंक ऑफ स्कॉटलैंड) 2.प्रतिवादी को किसी कर्मचारी की विश्वसनीयता की गारंटी देने के लिए आमंत्रित किया गया था। लेकिन उस कर्मचारी को बेईमानी के कारण नौकरी से निकाल दिया गया था। यह तथ्य जमानतदार को नहीं बताया गया था। गारंटी के बाद उसे नौकरी पर रखा गया था और उसने खातों में धोखाधड़ी/गबन किया था? जमानतदार पर हर्जाने के लिए मुकदमा दायर किया गया था? इस मामले में जमानतदार की जिम्मेदारी बताएं? (लंदन जनरल ओमनीबस कंपनी बनाम हॉलोवे) 3.plaintiff was in an aeroplane ✈️ with his two pets 🐕 dogs .he wanted to keep these dogs with him .but airlines denied and they kept them dogs in cargo with their full safety assurance .one of dogs died there and second dogs  had become unconscious due to to suffoca...

  Contact test  1.explain the facts  and decision of carlil versus carbolic smoke  ball company . कार्लिल बनाम कार्बोलिक स्मोक बाल‌ कम्पनी के तथ्य ओर निर्णय की  व्याख्या किजिए। This case is related with general offer .in this case a medical company had advertised  who will use their medicine .if anyone will suffer From a cold and a fever after taking leave his medicine. That person will be rewarded with 100 pond which had been deposited in a bank .a lady had consumed this medicine . She was suffering with influenza .company was  sued.the company was held liable for  compensation  This principle was held that offer can be communicated to the public .but  any one who will accept the offer and make a contract . That person has right to the contract  2.A person had advertised that his dog had lost .anyone who  will find  his dog and give to him .he will be rewarded with rs 500/ .B had found his dog . Can  B get this rewar...